(Windows Operating Systems only)
Both the Aztecs and Mayas were into human sacrifice and cannibalism. Are these things bad? Human beings kill and eat other animals. Why is killing and eating human animals any different? Where do our ideas about what is good and what is evil come from? Why do we now look with horror at the practices of these ancient civilizations?
It is because we have a highly evolved Christian ethical system - the "new wine" that Jesus talked about.
"Most of the languages of the world were first codified and put into writing by Christian missionaries. More schools and universities have been started by Christians than by any other group.
While some Pagans invented democracy, law, and science, others tore the hearts of victims sacrificed to their gods - under the influence of drugs that modern day atheists would make legal.
The folks who brought you much maligned Inquisition put an end to the Aztec cannibalistic cuisine.
More people have been murdered under the banner of communistic atheism than were killed all the religious wars in history combined. Even the Aztecs were no match for the atheists once they got going - under the influence of the "old wine" - the kind that makes you drunk with power.
16,000 priests, monks and nuns, as well as 12 Bishops were killed in Spain alone.
Had Marx and Hess not recruited atheists from the prisons of Europe to their cause their genocidal plans would have come to naught.
"The people of God co-operate with atheists; the most skilful accumulators of property ally themselves with communists; the peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe!
God rest ye merry gentlemen.
Particularly, ye who have hope of resurrection unto enternal life.
The late minister's best sermon.
the real world have been infinitely worse had the very real Jesus Christ never been born.
Is the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe part of a long history of Catholic reliquary fraud? The Catholic Encyclopedia seems to skirt the issue of its authenticity.
"It is clear that most "relics" are frauds. Furthermore, there is nothing in the Bible that supports the veneration of relics, even if they are genuine Furthermore, there is nothing in the Bible that supports the veneration of relics, even if they are genuine"
In any case, there is no question that the conversion of the American Indians of Mexico, South and Central America to Christianity put a miraculous end to the curious culinary habits of these people.
Dr. Philip Callahan, a University of Florida biophysicist, examined the tilma (image of the Lady of Guadalupe) and found it quite remarkable.
"It is this incredible brightness of the colors in the portrait that first impresses and astonishes nearly every visitor to the shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City today. The most notable feature of the robe is its remarkable luminosity. It is highly reflective of visible radiation yet transparent to the infrared rays.
Even more remarkable was the conversion of 9 million Indians to Christianity between 1532 and 1548 by this image and the testimony of Juan Diego.
On December 12, 1531 Mary appeared to Juan Diego telling him:
"Am I not of your kind?"
After the defeat of the Aztecs the Indians were wondering just what kind of people the Spanish were as Nuno de Guzman,the governor of Rio Panuco province, was enslaving them in search of his own power and glory - not giving a hoot about the advancement of the Kingdom of Christ. I suspect that Guzman was a Marrano as the Marranos dominated the slave trade in the Americas.
Guzman tried to foil the plans of Bishop Zumarraga, appointed by Emperor Charles V as protector of the Indians to convert the Indians to Chirstianity and to put and end to his enslavement of them.
In August of 1530 Charles had issued a royal decree, stating:
"No person shall dare to make a single Indian a slave whether in war or in peace, whether by barter, by purchase, by trade, or on any other pretext or cause whatever."
This "emancipation proclamation" is never mentioned in the Jewish controlled media. They would rather have you believe that the Spanish were only interested in gold and that they did not give a damn about the Indians except to enslave and exploit them. They want you to believe that the Indians were wiped out by European diseases and displaced by the Spanish. These are lies.
New Spain - Mexico today - is populated by the descendants of the Indians who were converted Christianity. These people were saved from the most diabolical system of enslavement and butchery ever known to man - thanks to the unbelievable courage of Cortez, his men, and the Lady of Guadalupe.
December News Box
Israeli Government Installed Palestinian Authority Arrests and Tortures Palestinian for Christmas Protest
"The 'crime' of Al-Arraj was that he replaced the decorations of the traditional Christmas tree on Manger square in Bethlehem with the used spent casings of bullets, flash-bangs, used tear gas grenades and other ammunitions which are gifted by the US regime to the zionists and are used to suppress the widespread dissent against the never-ending crime spree of the zionist invaders.
Al-Arraj is really being unfair. The Jewish and CIA spooked American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has ensured separation of Christian Church in our American Judaeo-Masonic state. So the bullets, flash-bangs, used tear gas grenades and other ammunitions can not be Christmas gifts from the US government. They should be thought of as tribute paid to a conquering politico-religious power by politicians who get elected through rigged touch screen voting machines and kick-backs from the foreign aid which they give to Israel. Not to mention the censored news they enjoy from the 100% Jewish owned and controlled "mainsteam media."
If Al-Arraj had done the same thing in America he would have been defended by the ACLU providing that the Christmas tree was in a public square. The issue would have been that the Palestinian Christians have no right to free speech on public property more than Al-Arraj's right to protest US aid to Israel by dressing up a Christmas tree with crowd control devices and munitions. The Jewish ACLU lawyers might have liked the idea.
While liberal Jewish ACLU assassination judge Alan Dershowitz advocated the use of torture in the US wars for Israel, prominent Jewish ACLU lawyer William Kunstler defended the blind Muslim cleric "Omar Abdel Rahman" against the charge that he was the mastermind of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center - a charge made by the son of a Mossad agent - US DA Michael Chertoff - who later became head of the US Department of (In)Security - with the Zionist Jewish judge Michael Bernard Mukasey presiding.
Mukasey refused to recuse himself - possibly because due to the fact that if Rahman did not have a Jewish Judge this would be unfair to his Jewish prosecutor and the Jewish defence attorney and hence and unfair to Israel.
With such a fine triple headed penny legal railroading (Chertoff on one side, Kunstler on the other and Mukasey on the edge) is it any wonder that Rahman was convicted even though the government's star witness, FBI agent provocateur Emad Salem, admitted that he built the bomb which went off in the WTC under the direction of the FBI which was under the direction of Michael Chertoff?
"In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit."
Razing it to the ground. Ha, Ha. Very funny.
I don't agree with everything that Brother Kapner has to say but being a former Jew he can say things which no one else can. His biased opinions and often prejudiced point of view are undoubtedly the result of his Jewish upbringing, and perhaps the result of the Talmudic penalty of death which Jewish converts to Christianity have to face. These "self hating jews" are in constant danger of committing suicide by shooting themselves several times in the back of the head.
John Lennon left us on December 8, 1980 - 33 years ago. There is some question as to whether Lennon was a Christian or not.
But the requirement of who is a Christian (i.e. who is saved) is not up to Ray Comfort or Clive Corin. Jesus does not require one to believe in Creationism, the Trinity, or any of the plethora of dogmas propounded by the "real chosen ones." The teachings of Jesus were highly symbolic and allegorical partly to confound the original "chosen ones" who thought that they knew it all. His criteria is very simple.
"I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life."
And who is it who listens to Jesus?
"Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice."
Is Ray Comfort of the truth? His video on Evoution vs. Creation does not allow comments. There can be only one reason to block debate on this issue: and that is because one has no argument.
Comfort makes the point that people without a moral religious foundation will not hesitate to commit homicide if they think that they could get away with it but he asked no one if they would commit murder just to become famous as he claims that Mark David Chapman did.
The evidence suggests that Chapman was a mind controlled patsy and that Lennon was shot by someone else. That's one way one of the amoral individals that Comfort interviewed could get away the crime of murder.
"Chapman because he had no motive to kill Lennon, he has been judged sane by the courts, and the forensic evidence indicates that he did not shoot Lennon because he was standing in the wrong spot. He was standing behind Lennon, to the right of Lennon. Yet all bullet wounds were on the left side of Lennon's body.
I submit that Lennon, in believing in truth and love - which is the essence of true Christianity - is far closer the Kingdom of God that those who adhere to a ridged dogma which excludes reason hence amounts to nothing more than mind control.
The arguments that A.E. Wilder-Smith made in terms of evolutionary theory may have convinced Lennon that the theory was incorrect.
"if excess water is present in the reacting mixture, peptide synthesis does not take place, equilibrium remains on the side of the initial reagents, the amino acids, which are the building blocks of life. This phenomenon is covered by the law of mass action: it is valid for all reversible reactions. Briefly said: in reactions of this type, synthesis of polypeptides from amino acids does not take place in the presence of excess water. The consequence of this well-known fact of organic chemistry is important: concentrations of amino acids will combine only in minute amounts, if they combine at all in a primeval ocean providing excess water, to form polypeptides. Any amounts of polypeptide which might be formed will be broken down into their initial components (amino acids) by the excess of water.
Unfortunately, those who do not understand those arguments and those do but who can not counter them reply to them with ad hominem attacks rather that well reasoned replies.
"Professor Wilder-Smith and Professor Andrews (University of London) were selected to debate the evolutionary professors Richard Dawkins and John Maynard-Smith. In his part in the debate Professor Wilder-Smith deliberately gave only scientific evidence as to why Darwinism cannot answer the origin of life puzzle, and why the evidence points firmly in the direction of an outside designer using information to order matter.
Among these atheists, evolution is not a science but a faith. Some of their ilk would have advised Joseph and Mary to terminate Mary's pregnancy.
"In claiming that it is "negligent" for the Catholic bishops to teach that all life is valuable, the ACLU's lawsuit "urges the government to that proclamation with civil liability, a clear violation of the First Amendment"
In which case, Christianity would have never been and the pederasty of fallen the Catholic priests which they complain about which was so common in the ancient world before the advent of Christianity would have never become a moral issue.
"The norm was for an adult male to have a relationship that lasted several years with an adolescent boy. When the boy reached maturity, he, then, was also expected to take a young lover."
The real issue with these priests is not one of the Catholic faith but of their own personal failure to live up to the standards of that faith and of the failure of the Church authorities to not, at the very least, defrock them.
"Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,1 Corinthians|6:10-11
Ordinarily this would not be very important news because before 9/11 no modern skyscraper had ever collapsed due to fire. Let me rephrase that. No skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire. The story is news because the US government's 9/11 story is a big lie.
"Here are a few clues as to why the Guangzhou high-rise burned for more than eleven hours, yet did not suffer the same fate as World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7"
It is news in the Alternative Media only because the failure of the "mainstream" monopoly media to point this fact out.
There should be a political movement to break up the "Mainstream" Media Monopoly - the 6 megacorporate super-pigs - with antitrust legislation because they are making a farce out of our democracy. Their withholding of the truth from the American people amounts to nothing less than obstruction of justice and conspiracy to rob and terrorize the American people as well as the rest of the world.
As John Lennon said, "we are the government", but only if we get off our collective computer cans and start making things happen!
December 23, 2013
Modern banking began when the medieval goldsmiths - who stored people's gold in vaults for a fee - found out that their depositors were using their receipts as money. They hit on the idea of printing receipts for gold deposits which did not exist and loaning them out for an interest payment. They could do this so long as they kept a fraction of their imaginary gold on hand to give to their depositors when they came to redeem their receipts.
As these fraudsters gained experience they realized that they could control the economy of a country by manipulating the number of gold receipts in circulation. A reduction in the number of receipts would cause an economic crash which they could cash in on by confiscating the collateral of those who defaulted on their loans. In other words, they were using the money which they created out of nothing to acquire the real wealth of their depositors.
One of these fraudsters, by the name of Mayer Amshel Bauer Rothschild, after financing the purchase of Hessian mercenary soldiers to put down the American insurgents, realized that he could gain control of the economies of entire nations by loaning them money to go to war with each other. Wars invariably lead to economic depressions in which real property can be bought up with money created out of nothing.
It was 100 years today that Amshel Bauer Rothschild's brainchild - the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 - came into existence. Written by banker kin to the Rothschilds - Paul Warburg - this law has resulted in the transfer of vast quantities of wealth to the chosen financiers, the Great Depression of 1930s, World Wars I and II - and virtually every other war and recession of the 20th Century - not to mention the well financed revolutions which follow on the heals of wars and economic collapses and the inflation! I don't know what Santa dollars or bunny bucks are going for these days but the real US dollar is worth only what 3 pennies could buy in 1913 when the FED came into existence.
As a mater of fact, I don't know why Santa is smiling. At this rate he will be laying off elves, putting a "for sale" sign on his sled, and Rudolph will be heading for the glue factory.
December 31, 2013
Wrong year, but it is New Year's Eve, and the message is still as Swedishly poignant as it was in 1989 - in an Abba sort of way.
Happy New Year
It's been more that 10 years since 9/11 and we are still dragging on with feet of clay. Whatever that means!
What bothers me the most about 2013 is after Sandy Hook nothing shown in the media could warrant the slightest degree of credibility.
It's important to know how many fingers the TV is showing you, you know.
2013 seems to be the year in which we have crossed over into the "1984" of everyone's nightmares.
The Snowden "defection" from the NSA has been touted as some kind landmark but there is nothing "new" to the Alternative Media in his revelations. What is "new" is that the monopoly media is giving him a whole lot of attention.
As more and more people are becoming aware of the Israeli connection to 9/11 it may becoming more and more difficult for the Mossad to operate in the US and the CIA is forbidden by law to operate within US borders.
And as people become weary of the endless wars for Israel ("War on Terrorism") it becomes imperative to do more and more false flags. So Snowden comes along - we "let down our gaurd" - another false flag and were are back on track on the oblivion express. Not a "New World Order" but a Nether World Chaos. As you can see from the chart below, far from being a boost to the economy as GW Bush saw it, the "War on Terror" has kicked the economy in the solar plexus and it is now teetering unpredictably at a precipice - if one can judge it based on the Dow Jones Industrial Average.