December 7, 1941: the day the Japanese government was goaded into attacking Pearl Harbor
by the Roosevelt administration
September 11, 2001: the "New Pearl Harbor" false flag operation
called for in the "Project for an New American Century".
Pearl Harbor was not a false flag like 9/11 but it
resulted in the death of millions of people world
Still 9/11 offers the promise of a nuclear third world war
in which even more people will be killed than in
the second world war.
Nothing like a memorable psy-ops but it is hard to tell who is
dead and who is alive with all the doubles and hollywood extras
Above is an article by Carol Valentine showing how
the Moonies Rag, the Washington Times, pitched in
in the class of civilizations fraud by hiring an
actor to impersonate MT graves. The Newspaper penciled
a connection between the actors eyebrows to make him
look more sinister. It only made him look as silly
as the actor Charlie Baxter playing the monobrowed
MT graves, the host of WCKT's the Dungeon show.
That the Washington Times could get away with this
ridiculous hoax shows the sorry state to which the
US media has sunken.
Of course, Zionism was behind the Second World war as it was
behind the First World War and it is behind the beating
of the drums of war for the Third World War, as well.
The last time Israel offered to help Americans after they
did a flase flag operation in which they massacred Americans
was during the attack on the USS Liberty.
FDR was undoubtedly the most evil president in American history.
Not only is he responsible for World War II; He also convinced
the world that his atrocities were Hitler's.
"President Roosevelt's Role
I refer to the book by Professor Charles Beard entitled President Roosevelt and the
Coming of the War 1941, which was published by the Yale University Press in April
This book, which comes with all the authority of its eminent author, is nothing
less than a tremendous indictment of President Roosevelt on three main issues.
Firstly, that he got himself elected on the strength of repeated promises, to
the effect that he would keep the U.S.A. out of any European war;
secondly, that he incessantly and flagrantly disregarded not only his
promises to the American people, but all the laws of neutrality;
thirdly, that at a predetermined moment he deliberately converted
this cold war, which he had been conducting, into a shooting war, by sending the
Japanese an ultimatum, which no one could imagine could result in anything but
From many instances given relating to the first issue, I quote one:
"At Boston on October 30th, 1940, he (F.D.R.) was even more emphatic, for
there he declared:
'I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your
boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars';
and on December 29th:
'You can therefore nail any talk about sending armies to Europe as
Professor Beard goes on to prove that while Mr. Roosevelt was making these
speeches, he was treating international laws of neutrality with total disregard, and in
the interests only of those who were fighting the Jews' battles.
The two main forms of non-shooting intervention were the convoying of
U.S. ships of ammunition and supplies for the allies, and the Lend Lease Act.
Whatever be our sentiments in appreciating the help of the U.S. arsenals and navy
under these two cold war decisions of Mr. Roosevelt, no one can pretend that they
were either in accordance with his pledges to the American people, or the
fundamentals of international law regarding neutrality...
Representative Philip Bennett, of Missouri, declared:
But our boys are not going to be sent abroad, says the President.
Nonsense, Mr Chairman; even now their berths are being built in our transport
ships. Even now the tags for identification of the dead and wounded are being
printed by the firm of William C. Ballantyne and Co., of Washington."
Professor Beard proves the third point at great length, showing how at the appropriate
moment President Roosevelt forced the Japanese into war by an ultimatum
demanding instant compliance with terms, which could never have been accepted by
As the war proceeded the real policy and sympathies of the President became more
and more apparent. His deception of the British and their Allies was no less flagrant
than his deception of the American people...
We have seen from a previous chapter that it was not the preservation of the British
Empire, nor the French Empire, nor the Dutch, that swayed the President. On the
contrary, he had advised his ardent lieutenant, Mr. Churchill, at an early stage in the
cold war that these must be liquidated.
It was not Europe, nor the countries of Europe, nor their liberties, nor rights under the
Atlantic Charter of Four Freedoms which weighed with him.
We know now that the British and American armies were actually halted by General
Ike Eisenhower under Mr. Roosevelt's rulings at the Yalta Conference, so that the Red
Army of Jewish Bolshevism might overflow half Europe and occupy Berlin.
To quote again from Professor Beard:
"As a consequence of the war called necessary to overthrow Hitler's despotism,'
another despotism was raised to a higher pitch of power."...
For limited Government under supreme law they may substitute personal and
arbitrary government -- the first principle of the totalitarian system against which
it has been alleged that World War II was waged-while giving lip service to the
principle of constitutional government."
When we reflect upon the astounding contents of Professor Beard's book, and
consider them in conjunction with the revelations in Colonel Roosevelt's As He Saw It,
the question arises: whom, and which interests did President Roosevelt not betray.
To this query I can only see one answer, namely, those people and their interests who
planned from the start the use of United States arsenals and Forces to prosecute a
war which would annihilate a Europe which had freed itself from Jewish gold and
revolutionary control: people who planned to dissolve the British Empire, to forge
chains of unrepayable debt, wherewith to coerce Britain to this end; and to enable the
Soviets to "bestride Europe like a colossus,"* in other words, International Jewry.
*These very words were used by General Smuts, who added words to the effect that
he welcomed such a prospect. It should be remembered that General Smuts was
formerly chief legal adviser to the Zionist Organisation in S. Africa.
"Phoney war" ended by civilian bombing
Though a state of war was declared to exist between Britain and Germany in
September of 1939, it very soon became apparent that no war was being conducted
by Germany against this country.
This was no surprise to those who knew the facts of the case. Hitler had again and
again made it clear, that he never intended to attack or harm Great Britain or the
With the Siegfried Line strongly held, and no German intention of
appearing west of it, stalemate in the west, or
the "Phoney War,"
as it came to be called, must, in the absence of bombing of civilian
populations ultimately peter out altogether.
No one was quicker to perceive this than the pro-Jewish war mongers; and they and
their friends inside and outside the House of Commons very soon began exerting
pressure for this form of bombing of Germany to be started.
it was Britain that started this ruthless form of war on the very evening of
the day on which Mr. Churchill became Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940.
Benjamin Freedman's Speach at the Wilard Hotel (mp3)
1933: Jewry Declares War
The English edition of Mein Kampf was still in the process of printing
and publication when Jewry declared war on the national Socialist
regime, and started an intensive blockade against Germany....
On his return to the U.S.A., Mr. Untermeyer gave an address over
Station W.A.B.C., the text of which, as printed in the New York Times
of August 7th, 1933, I have before me. Mr. Untermeyer referred in the
opening phrases to:
"The holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked";
and proceeded to develop the subject at great length, describing
the Jews as the aristocrats of the world.
"Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this
sacred war should do so now and here."
Those Jews who did not join in he denounced, declaring:
"They are traitors to their race."
In January 1934 Mr. Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism, wrote in Natcha
"The fight against Germany has been carried out for months by every Jewish
community, conference, trade organisation, by every Jew in the world . . . we
shall let loose a spiritual and a material war of the whole world against
By 1938 the Jewish war was in full swing; and already through their influence or
pressure many Gentile persons and groups were being drawn into the vortex. Various
members of the British Socialist Party were openly advocating joining in this cold war;
and a vigorous and uncompromising clique was growing in all Parties under the
leadership of Messrs. Churchill, Amery, Duff, Cooper and others.
"Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced to it, not this year, but later
on," screamed the Jew Emil Ludwig in the June copy of Les Aniles 1934.
Even the wealthiest and most influential magnates of the
land dare not brave the wrath of organised Jewry...
Not only in Britain has this been the case, but perhaps
even more noticeably in the U.S.A., as the diaries of the
late Mr James Forrestal prove.
The most important revelation therein is
dated the 27th December, 1945 (pages 121 and 122):
"Played golf today with Joe Kennedy (Joseph P. Kennedy,
who was Roosevelt's Ambassador to Great Britain in the
years immediately before the war). I asked him about his
conversations with Roosevelt and Neville Chamberlain f
rom 1938 on.
He said Chamberlain's position in 1938 was that England
had nothing with which to fight and that she could not
risk going to war with Hitler.
Kennedy's view: That Hitler would have fought Russia without
any later conflict with England if it had not been for Bullitt's
(William C. Bullitt -- a half-Jew -- then Ambassador to France)*
urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939 that the Germans
must be faced down about Poland; neither the French nor the
British would have made Poland a cause of war if it had not
been for the constant needling from Washington.
Bullitt, he said, kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans
wouldn't fight, Kennedy that they would, and that they would
overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he said, stated that America
and the world Jews had forced England into the war...
"Chamberlain had told him that he was under great
pressure from World Jewry not to accommodate Hitler."
A second most important revelation in the Forrestal Diaries
It is clear from the entries, that by December, 1947,
Mr. Forrestal was becoming greatly concerned by the
intervention of the Zionists into American politics.
The Diary records on the 3rd Feb., 1948 (pages 362 and 363):
"Visit today from Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr., who came in with
strong advocacy of a Jewish State in Palestine, that we should
support the United Nations 'decision',
I pointed out that the United Nations had as yet
taken no 'decision', that it was only a recommendation
of the General Assembly and that I thought the methods
that had been used by people outside of the Executive
branch of the Government to bring coercion
and duress on other nations in the General
Assembly bordered closely onto scandal . . .
After a short note by the Editor of the Diaries the entry
for the 3rd Feb., 1948, continues (page 364):
"Had lunch with Mr. B. M. Baruch. After lunch raised the
same question with him. He took the line of advising me
not to be active in this particular matter, and that I was
already identified, to a degree that was not in my own
interest, with opposition to the United Nations policy on
It was about this time that a campaign of unparalleled
slander and calumny was launched in the United States
press and periodicals against Mr. Forrestal.
So greatly did this appear to have affected him
that in March 1949, he resigned from the U.S.
Defence Secretaryship; and on the 22nd of that
month was found dead as a result of a
fall from a very high window. "
The Nameless War